The STF detractors
Abstract
Although institutions are made up of people, history shows that they acquire behaviors, over time, which are not necessarily the sum of their members' behavior. In addition, this behavior changes, mistakes and successes are made. Therefore, it is very difficult to judge an institution. In the situation of almost anomie because Brazil currently passes, there are those who try to disqualify institutions for acts practiced in another context, under different conditions. When the Supreme Federal Court, by its ministers, tries to curb abuses committed and illegalities practiced, a discredited campaign was launched to discredit our Pretorio Excelso, in an orchestration of different cultural levels. If it is the right of any citizen to disagree with an act practiced by an institution, he must seek the means that the Law gives him to express his disagreement. No one has the right to disqualify it or propose its extinction for disagreeing with any act or decision. Threatening the ministers that comprise it and their families is the attitude of bandits, who as such should be treated. Above all, democratic values and the fundamental principles of the rule of law must prevail, hard-won. It is the duty of every citizen to defend them.
References
BRASIL; Presidência da República; Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil; 1967
BRASIL; Presidência da República; Decreto 702/36; Rio de Janeiro; 1936.
BRASIL; Senado Federal; Grandes momentos do parlamento brasileiro. v. 1, CD 4; Brasília - DF; 1998.
BRASIL; Senado Notícias de 22.05.2020; Brasília – DF; 2020.
JARDIM, Lauro; Reportagem citada pela Revista Forum em 09.07.2020; Santos - SP; 2020.
MELLO, Ministro Celso de; Entrevista do Ministro Celso de Mello ao Jornal Correio Braziliense, em 08.05.2020; Brasília – DF; 2020.
MELO, Tarso de; Artigo para Revista Cult em 17.01.2020; Editora Bregantini; São Paulo - SP; 2020.
FGV; Centro de Pesquisa e Documentação de História Contemporânea do Brasil; Rio de Janeiro; 2001
MENDES, Ministro Gilmar; Entrevista ao Jornal Folha de São Paulo em 14.07.2020; São Paulo – SP; 2020.
MORAIS, Fernando; Olga; Editora Alfa-Ômega; São Paulo; 1989.
SADER; Entrevista com a Psicóloga Eliana Sader; São Paulo - SP; 2020.
STF; Julgamento da ADPF-572 para declarar a legalidade e a constitucionalidade do Inquérito 4781 das fake-news; Portal do STF; Brasília – DF; 2020.
STF; Julgamento pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal do pedido de habeas corpus no 26.155; Revista Jurisprudência, v. XXX/252/253; Rio de Janeiro; 1936.
STF; Seção de Gestão Documental e Memória Institucional do Supremo Tribunal Federal; Brasília – DF; 2020.
STF; Voto do Ministro Celso de Mello no julgamento pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal da ADPF-153; Informativo no 588; Brasília – DF; 2010.
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Former Law Students Association of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
When publishing the scientific article, the author confirms that the work is original and has not previously been published in any other periodical or physical or digital book and should otherwise submit the reservation with the respective information of the publication. It also assigns the copyright of the article to the magazine that will make its content available for free through the portal, without, however, assigning to any other magazine or publisher the material for publication unless previously authorized by the author.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License.